Open Stack

Several of the core service packages skipped RC1 and went from milestone 3
to RC2. I generally avoid mixing packages with a difference of more than
one milestone/RC version... especially milestones given significant changes
to the services.

P.S. - Does anyone from RH work on the installation guide these days?

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Steve Gordon <sgordon at redhat.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgordon at redhat.com>
> > To: "Matt Kassawara" <mkassawara at gmail.com>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Matt Kassawara" <mkassawara at gmail.com>
> > > To: "Steve Gordon" <sgordon at redhat.com>
> > >
> > > While OpenStack RC code often sufficiently tests services, packaging
> > > concerns such as dependencies and default configuration options tend
> to lag
> > > by one or more milestone/RC cycles. The RDO repository only contained
> > > milestone 3 packages until just prior to the official release of Juno
> when
> > > RC2 packages appeared in it.
> >
> > RC2 tarballs themselves only became available just prior to the official
> > release (e.g. Oct 9th for Cinder, Oct 10th for Neutron) and were put into
> > the repo on the 13th. The gap between RC1 tarballs being available and
> being
> > put in the repo was similar.
> >
> > > Testing packages (even just the core services), writing patches,
> reviewing
> > > patches, and general time allocation
> > > issues can delay a functional installation guide by a week or more
> beyond
> > > the package release date. Furthermore, the RDO packages require
> testing on
> > > RHEL/CentOS and Fedora plus the neutron and nova-network variations. I
> > > would like to provide users with a mostly functional installation
> guide on
> > > the official release date which would require availability of at least
> RC
> > > packages at least one week prior to the official release date.
> > > release packages becoming available yesterday afternoon and the plan
> to cut
> > > juno/stable for openstack-manuals tomorrow gives us about one day to
> > > install the packages on two distributions each with two variants,
> determine
> > > the issues, write patches, test them, and run them through the review
> > > process before all changes involve backports.
> >
> > As a result of user feedback from previous test days we stage and test
> the
> > RDO packages to ensure basic sanity before putting them into the repo,
> this
> > takes time but ensures that we have at least some level of confidence in
> the
> > packages being deployed and avoids user frustration caused by basic
> issues
> > that can be easily prevented. If you wish to access the staged packages
> in
> > future while they are still undergoing testing, just ask (they are
> public,
> > just not in the main repo).
>
> Going back through the repo [1] we pushed builds based on the final
> release into the repo on the 22nd/23rd and held off formally announcing
> while we fixed a few more bugs over the weekend.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> [1]
> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/?C=M;O=A
> > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Steve Gordon <sgordon at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Matt Kassawara" <mkassawara at gmail.com>
> > > > > To: "Anne Gentle" <anne at openstack.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > If other reasons (outside of the installation guide) exist to move
> it
> > > > > on
> > > > > the 29th rather than wait until after the summit, I can deal... but
> > > > > backporting patches for RHEL/CentOS/Fedora will take more time and
> > > > effort.
> > > > > Not our fault RDO can't push release packages out in a reasonable
> > > > > amount
> > > > of
> > > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Can you elaborate on what's reasonable so we can endeavour to
> accommodate
> > > > in future? Our aim this time around was for +2 weeks on upstream
> release
> > > > to
> > > > allow some level of smoke testing to occur, despite that M-3 and RC
> > > > packages that could have been used were available leading up to this.
> > > >
> > > > We've been communicating this to users @
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Matt Kassawara
> > > > > > <mkassawara at gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> The RDO Juno release packages for RHEL/CentOS/Fedora only became
> > > > > >> available today [1] which leaves very little time for testing
> and
> > > > patching
> > > > > >> the installation guide prior to cutting juno/stable for
> > > > openstack-manuals
> > > > > >> on the 29th. Can we push it out a day or two?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think if we don't do the 29th it'll be after Nov 7th due to
> > > > > > Andreas's
> > > > > > and my travel schedules, is that an okay solution?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> https://openstack.redhat.com/forum/discussion/992/rdo-juno-packages-available
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> > > > > >> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > > > > >>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > OpenStack-docs mailing list
> > > > > OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Steve Gordon, RHCE
> > > > Sr. Technical Product Manager,
> > > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-docs mailing list
> > OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
> >
>
> --
> Steve Gordon, RHCE
> Sr. Technical Product Manager,
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20141028/d365d7f5/attachment.html>