Open Stack

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:44:21 -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Gauvain Pocentek <
> gauvain.pocentek at objectif-libre.com> wrote:
> 
> > Le 2014-06-20 14:37, Anne Gentle a écrit :
> >> The /trunk content was meant to be much less findable but over the
> >> years it has become sought. It's probably time to delete it entirely
> >> now that we have docs-draft links always available.
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > Could we imagine having a "hidden" build somewhere? It's nice to have the
> > trunk available to check if bugs reported on icehouse have been fixed in
> > the trunk.
> >
> I like this idea and have tried to have /trunk be unsearchable. If we
> switch /icehouse to be /icehouse and /current and then create a /dev, and
> never point to /dev links, could it be hidden?

How about blocking /trunk in robots.txt? Is that what you mean with "tried
to have /trunk be unsearchable"? Did that not work?

robots.txt should also take care of our "Custom Search" (which throws a
variety of releases at the poor user). Presumably, that's how most people
end up reading trunk.

Roger