Open Stack

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Matt Kassawara <mkassawara at gmail.com> wrote:

> Cool, thanks! I'm not sure about the wording "Document for Icehouse", but
> the watermark definitely makes the version more obvious. How about
> "Icehouse Installation Guide" or just "Icehouse" ?
>
> On a related note, can we take any other routes to reduce search engine
> visibility of defunct documents such as the Grizzly installation guide?
>

I can delete those on the web server.

Are we pretty confident in the redirects? Or is there a better way to
eliminate those hits?


>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/07/2014 06:56 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Matt Kassawara <mkassawara at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:mkassawara at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Yeah... and perhaps releases that we still support or appear
>> >     frequently in searches.
>> >
>> >
>> > Can you do some testing to see if it's possible to mark text that does
>> > not include DRAFT?
>> >
>>
>> I just tested this patch:
>> https://review.openstack.org/105246
>>
>> Note that we can only publish Icehouse and Havana guides, there's no way
>> to push Grizzly or older changes out using our infrastructure.
>>
>> If the patch above is fine, I can backport to Havana as well,
>>
>> Andreas
>> --
>>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>>    GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140707/acc07c3a/attachment-0001.html>