Open Stack

Hi all,
Looping in the openstack-docs list as well since I don't want to be a
blocker.

The filenames such as ch13 may be misleading. The way the docs are built,
an xml:id is used to create each separate HTML file unless there are
chunking instructions in the file that would cause it to be separated out
differently.

So rearranging the files will cause the output to be reordered.

Honestly I think you'd find it less confusing if you rename the files
without numbers.

Then look at the bk_openstack-sec-guide.xml file and see that it goes from
9 to 11 and skips 10:

   <xi:include href="ch009_case-studies.xml"/>
    <xi:include href="ch011_management-introduction.xml"/>

I also see it skips the file named ch007:


    <xi:include href="ch006_introduction-to-case-studies.xml"/>
    <xi:include href="ch008_system-roles-types.xml"/>

Hope this gives you some more clues to find your missing content. Looking
through git logs I don't see evidence that makes me think the bk file
changed much?

Let me know what you find out as you keep digging.

Anne







On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Sriram Subramanian
<sriram at sriramhere.com>wrote:

> yes, they are missing. How come the doc is not missing though?
> http://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/content/
>
> Looping in Anne:
>
> Anne - could you please help us let us know why some chapters are missing
> in the security guide source tree:
> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/master/doc/security-guide
> .?
>
> Are we looking at wrong place?
>
> thanks,
> -Sriram
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:45 AM, David Mortman <mortman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at the source tree here:
>>
>> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/master/doc/security-guide
>> .
>>
>> Note that the list I provided are the ones that are missing.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Sriram Subramanian
>> <sriram at sriramhere.com> wrote:
>> > David : where are you looking? published version contains it, for
>> example.
>> >
>> http://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/content/ch013_node-bootstrapping.html
>> .
>> >
>> > Now that this getting renewed, are we sticking to the proposed division
>> of
>> > labor, or something new?
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> > -Sriram
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Bryan D. Payne <bdpayne at acm.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This is news to me.  I'd suggest hopping onto #openstack-doc or
>> sending an
>> >> email to the doc team to ask what's up with that.
>> >>
>> >> -bryan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:36 AM, David Mortman <mortman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> It seems there are several chapters missing from master atm:
>> >>>
>> >>> 10,16,19,23,29,36,40,45,50,54,57 and 60
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone know what's up with that?
>> >>>
>> >>> thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> -DM
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 1:06 PM, David Mortman <mortman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > Thanks!
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Bryan D. Payne <bdpayne at acm.org>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >> At this point, I'd say master.
>> >>> >> -bryan
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:30 PM, David Mortman <mortman at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> To be clear, should we be working on master or stable/havana?
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:12 AM, David Mortman <mortman at gmail.com
>> >
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > Bryan
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > I'm still on board, just been swamped with commitments from the
>> >>> >>> > paying
>> >>> >>> > job. I'm planning on doing a bunch on the flights to (and
>> hopefully
>> >>> >>> > from)  RSA though.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > thanks
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > -DM
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Sriram Subramanian
>> >>> >>> > <sriram at sriramhere.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> Bryan
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> Couldn't get hold of De and David after initial email
>> exchanges.
>> >>> >>> >> No
>> >>> >>> >> progress
>> >>> >>> >> after that. I am little tied up with my current commitments
>> >>> >>> >> though.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >>> >>> >> -Sriram
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Bryan D. Payne <
>> bdpayne at acm.org>
>> >>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> Hey guys... I haven't heard anything in a while on the book
>> >>> >>> >>> editing
>> >>> >>> >>> efforts.  Can I get an update?
>> >>> >>> >>> -bryan
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Sriram Subramanian
>> >>> >>> >>> <sriram at sriramhere.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> Dear all,
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> You must have received a Google Share notification. Here is
>> the
>> >>> >>> >>>> link
>> >>> >>> >>>> if
>> >>> >>> >>>> you haven't:
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/a/sriramhere.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlwxLcOYVNFAdF9QNEQxekViQ3ZVUTlMTjhRU3B1S0E&usp=sharing
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> Since we are in multiple time zones, I came up with rough
>> >>> >>> >>>> division of
>> >>> >>> >>>> chapters based on page count among us (~ 70 pages each). I am
>> >>> >>> >>>> planning on
>> >>> >>> >>>> working few hours every day on this next week and in first
>> week
>> >>> >>> >>>> of
>> >>> >>> >>>> Jan,targeting 5 pages a day. So came up with rough timeline
>> >>> >>> >>>> reflecting that.
>> >>> >>> >>>> Please add some timelines based on your availability so that
>> we
>> >>> >>> >>>> have
>> >>> >>> >>>> an idea
>> >>> >>> >>>> of completion. If you want to pick up the chapters I chose,
>> >>> >>> >>>> please
>> >>> >>> >>>> let me
>> >>> >>> >>>> know.
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>> >>> >>>> -Sriram
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >>> >>> >> -Sriram
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> > -Sriram
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> -Sriram
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140217/862c3456/attachment.html>