Open Stack

On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:54:49 -0600, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > I agree with all of that. We are considering it, and right now I am
> > skeptical. So let me rephrase my question: do we expect a 2x +2 requirement
> > to provide a net benefit in the forseeable future (Kilo cycle)?
> >
> It's a good question, and here's my input. In the early days of docs, we
> had three of us, and really it was just me merging my own patches. But then
> when we got a few more people, say less than 10, I would still merge things
> for speed as needed, but tried to wait for reviews. As the reviews got more
> valuable, then waiting for the second +2 was really worthwhile. Plus, it

Good to hear this has already been tried under similar circumstances. One
question: did you vote +2 on your own patches and then wait for another +2,
or did you post your patches waiting for two core reviewers to give you +2
each?

Roger