Open Stack

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:46:41 +0100, Pranav Salunke wrote:
> Roger, sometimes there is not an urgent need for improvement but that
> does not mean that we stop improving (IMHO). If I recall correctly, we
> decided to not have 2 x +2's due to the size of our core-reviewer team.
> Now that we will have more core reviewers, it should be considered.

I agree with all of that. We are considering it, and right now I am
skeptical. So let me rephrase my question: do we expect a 2x +2 requirement
to provide a net benefit in the forseeable future (Kilo cycle)?

Roger