On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Christian Berendt <berendt at b1-systems.de> wrote: > Just checked our bk-files for missing copyright years. > > Sometimes <year> is used this way: > > <copyright> > <year>2012</year> > <year>2013</year> > <year>2014</year> > [...] > </copyright> > > And sometimes this way: > > <copyright> > <year>2010-2014</year> > [...] > </copyright> > > Which way is the correct one? > > I base "correct" on http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/copyright.html > And should the other occurrences be fixed? > > That said, I don't think it's worthwhile to fix (unless a lawyer disagrees?) > Christian. > > -- > Christian Berendt > Cloud Computing Solution Architect > Mail: berendt at b1-systems.de > > B1 Systems GmbH > Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de > GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 > > _______________________________________________ > Openstack-docs mailing list > Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140814/c90cf231/attachment.html>