Open Stack

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeremy Stanley" <fungi at yuggoth.org>
> To: openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:09:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-docs] docutils repo?
> 
> On 2013-11-26 22:39:16 +0100 (+0100), Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > I've asked #openstack-infra for help and got pointers on how to request
> > a new repo - and since fungi was confused by "docutils" I took the
> > proposal from the etherpad and proposed "doctools".
> [...]
> 
> Yes, my confusion was that it sounded at first like you were talking
> about wanting to fork an extremely well-known project (at least in
> Python development circles):
> 
>     http://docutils.sourceforge.net/
> 
> As the reference interpreter library for reStructuredText, the
> primary document markup language for Python development, the name
> Docutils would lead to heavy confusion amongst most of our developer
> community.
> 
> Unfortunately, DocTools is the original module name for Sphinx, so not
> a whole lot better in that regard:
> 
>     https://wiki.python.org/moin/DocTools
> 
> To cut a long story short, descriptive project names tend to already
> be taken.

I would argue on the contrary, non-descriptive project names tend to already be taken (arguably because stepping outside generic terms mean you should be doing legal checks) but anyway... What about openstack/openstack-publishing-tools*?

Thanks,

Steve

---

* Otherwise so far I've [1] come up with these alternatives:

Door Stormy
Meaningful Torpedo
Confidential Oyster
Maximum Essential Mountain
Sledgehammer Strong

I vote for Maximum Essential Mountain ;).

[1] http://online-generator.com/name-generator/project-name-generator.php