Open Stack

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Steve Gordon <sgordon at redhat.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anne Gentle" <annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
> > To: "Nicholas Chase" <nchase at mirantis.com>
> > Cc: openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 4:20:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-docs] Review: Program description for OpenStack
>       Documentation
> >
> > You know, I'm thinking it's overly complex and "listy" anyway. I think
> this
> > is simpler, and I meant to indicate core:
> >
> > Promote OpenStack adoption by providing documentation for core projects.
> > Develop, maintain, and create tools and processes to ensure quality,
> > accurate documentation treated like OpenStack code.
> >
> > Thoughts on simplifying?
>
> Is the intent here to explicitly rule out coverage of the projects that
> fall into the relatively recently added "integrated" category (I ask mainly
> because I have noticed there already is some minimal coverage of the Heat
> CLI for instance and I plan to add likewise for Ceilometer)?
>
>
I do intend to not explicitly promise coverage for non-core. That stems
from guidance from Thierry. That doesn't mean we won't document integrated
projects but that our mission is core coverage.


> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>



-- 
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130723/9c06fdec/attachment.html>