[Openstack-docs] Help with build
Tom Fifield
tom at openstack.org
Wed Aug 28 21:21:12 UTC 2013
On 29/08/13 06:02, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Thanks Lorin and David.
>
> I talked to David today about my general concerns with maintaining our
> own RNG file when a standard could be what we want. So I'm glad that a
> DocBook 5.1 candidate is out!
>
> I do want to caution reviewers that we have to make a judgement call
> about super-fine-grained inclusions. Sometimes reuse is not the best
> solution and rewriting would be better. Sometimes reuse IS the solution
> and you should rewrite something generically for re-use in multiple
> places. With many contributors looking at the repo for the first time,
> it's a fine line to walk, to make sure we have good judgement calls on
> reuse.
This sounds like a very reasonable approach/wording - should we dump
that on a wiki somewhere?
> Thanks,
> Anne
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Lorin Hochstein
> <lorin at nimbisservices.com <mailto:lorin at nimbisservices.com>> wrote:
>
> All right, let's give it a shot: https://review.openstack.org/44134
>
> Lorin
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, David Cramer
> <david.cramer at rackspace.com <mailto:david.cramer at rackspace.com>> wrote:
>
> Btw., we might test with CR1 of the 5.1 schema:
>
> http://docbook.org/xml/5.1CR1/rng/
>
> Specifically:
> http://docbook.org/xml/5.1CR1/rng/docbookxi.rng
>
> That should fix the problem. If it doesn't, then we will want to
> log a bug.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> On 08/27/2013 12:04 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > On 08/26/2013 11:13 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> Our gate runs tools/validate.py, true, and we need validation
> to happen
> >> at the gate, yes. I'm saying I want us all to agree to the
> .rng schema
> >> not just put in a terribly forgiving one.
> >>
> >> I want a bigger view and more time to think through what we
> really want.
> >> I'm currently not in agreement with David Cramer about what
> should be
> >> xi:included -- it's really hard to maintain XML that points to
> >> fine-grained inclusions if you're not the only author or you
> don't sit
> >> next to each other and so on. So I am wanting a wider window for
> >> considerations for our global contributor base.
> >>
> >> I also want everyone to know that this particular patch has
> file names
> >> with colons and parens and slashes in them, and won't
> validate any way,
> >> even if the section is added, until those file names are
> changed. Since
> >> the files are auto-generated, we'll need to change the file name
> >> generation portion as well. I've patched the patch to try to
> get Tom
> >> unblocked but he'll have to pick up where he left off and
> change those
> >> file names as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Anne
> >
> > Thanks Anne for the detailed explanation, this is a good
> approach forward,
> >
> > Andreas
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lorin Hochstein
> Lead Architect - Cloud Services
> Nimbis Services, Inc.
> www.nimbisservices.com <http://www.nimbisservices.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anne Gentle
> annegentle at justwriteclick.com <mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list