[Openstack-docs] ops guide japanese build fails due to split repositories
Tom Fifield
tom at openstack.org
Tue Aug 27 22:22:02 UTC 2013
On 28/08/13 00:35, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org
> <mailto:tom at openstack.org>> wrote:
>
> Cheers for the look-in :) I agree we should be looking at the
> general case ... sorry for the short-sighted bug report!
>
> Thought about the idea of putting things in openstack-infra/config
> too, but discarded it. Essentially, I think we can do this without
> putting additional review load on openstack-infra. Having a
> bare-bones configuration in openstack-infra/config that points to
> scripts in docs-controlled repositories would enable us to be much
> more responsive to updates, and means we don't need to bother infra :)
>
> The last few patches I put through to config are took 1-3 weeks to
> get through. Importantly, this is completely fine - our patches are
> definitely low priority compared to others, and being typically less
> skilled at the ways of jenkins-job-builder we do want the time spent
> on thorough review from the overworked infracores.
>
>
> I ask for eyeballs in #openstack-infra if I have a review delay. They
> also have a separate Jenkins job review team so for these types of job
> additions I think your experience is atypical.
>
> I've put this patch in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43734/ as a
> fix. Basically the zuul layout file is running in openstack-manuals and
> should run for operations-guide. What I'm unsure of, though, is whether
> the same pom.xml is used for non-english output. David or Daisy can you
> review?
mm. I hadn't realised we're already in this state:
> 2) Copy the tools into the openstack-ops repo and perform
> the painful
> ongoing task of keep them synchronised
If that's the decision, then it's an easy-to-fix patch in config.
However, I think this state is sub-optimal. I note that the tools
directory in operations-guide is already way out of sync with the one in
operations-manual, bolstering the claim somewhat :)
I also still feel that moving tools into openstack-infra/config is not
the solution - and it appears my point above has been missed ... it's
not entirely about the timing! It's also about adding to the workload of
a busy team, and whose 'job' it is to review what.
My advice would be to take a look at what nova, neutron et al do with
their 'tools' directories.
Regards,
Tom
> Thanks,
> Anne
>
>
> However, this doesn't seem like a tenable situation for the tools,
> given the amount of churn we're going through right now (consider eg
> validate.py!). I think it would seriously slow things down for
> something that could potentially be done another way.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 25/08/13 01:17, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
> Is there an option to store the tool in openstack-infra/config and
> point it at different repos? They're already running scripts to send
> Horizon strings to transifex. This makes me think so:
> https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/32824/3/modules/openstack___project/files/jenkins_job___builder/config/translation-__jobs.yaml
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32824/3/modules/openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config/translation-jobs.yaml>
>
> Plus
> https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/34700/3/modules/jenkins/__files/slave_scripts/propose___translation_update_manuals.sh
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34700/3/modules/jenkins/files/slave_scripts/propose_translation_update_manuals.sh>
> points to a repo and a folder.
>
> It's from one the original patches Daisy sent through to start
> translations. Clark or Jeremy, do you know if a change in the config
> project would do what's needed -- slice docs from any repo?
>
> It's important to figure out because the next priority to me
> would be
> the API quick start in the openstack/api-site repo, then the install
> guides, so we have at least 3 repos with docs to translate. We could
> put all the high-priority-to-translate docs in one repo but that
> seems
> too rigid. Let's find a way.
>
> Thanks,
> Anne
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org
> <mailto:tom at openstack.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just throwing this bug out there for your comment to select
> a way forward:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/__openstack-manuals/+bug/1216153
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1216153>
>
>
> The build job for the Japanese version of the Operations
> Guide was
> merged at: https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/39846/
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39846/>
>
> However, from the first run of the job (logs:
> https://jenkins01.openstack.__org/job/openstack-operations-__guide-ja/1/console
> <https://jenkins01.openstack.org/job/openstack-operations-guide-ja/1/console>)
> it becomes clear that it fails due to the split repositories.
>
> 2013-08-23 23:42:49.457 | cp: cannot stat
> `./doc/src/docbkx/openstack-__ops': No such file or directory
>
> To fix this, we either need to:
>
> 1) Check out the openstack-ops repo into manuals for build time
>
> 2) Copy the tools into the openstack-ops repo and perform
> the painful
> ongoing task of keep them synchronised
>
> 3) move openstack-ops back into the openstack-manuals repo
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
> _________________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.__openstack.org
> <mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-docs
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anne Gentle
> annegentle at justwriteclick.com <mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list