Open Stack

Hello.
I replied via Rabbitmq Quorum topic. But we can setup it to workaround

[oslo_messaging_rabbit]
kombu_reconnect_delay=0.5


Nguyen Huu Khoi


On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 3:55 PM Arnaud <arnaud.morin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello, you mean this is the reason why the transient queues are not HA?
> (And thus not quorum when using quorums).
>
> This is still a problem to me, when you lose a rabbit from the cluster.
> The probability to lose messages is very high. So the probability to have
> an instance in error is also very high (as a public cloud provider, our api
> is used a lot, there is a lot of creation/deletion of instances).
>
> Enabling HA for transient queues is helping in that situation.
>
>
> Le 16 juin 2023 16:06:49 GMT+02:00, "Nguyễn Hữu Khôi" <
> nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello.
>> I think that is the reason why people don't use all quorum queue.
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1607830
>>
>> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 4:55 PM Arnaud Morin <arnaud.morin at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey team,
>>>
>>> I'd like to understand the stakes behing the update_resources_interval
>>> parameter ([1])
>>>
>>> We decided on our side to increase this value from 60sec to 600sec (see
>>> [2]).
>>>
>>> What I understand is that is will "delay" the update of metrics on nova
>>> side.
>>> I mostly think that these metrics are used by filter scheduler to select
>>> the best host when scheduling.
>>>
>>> Is there anything else it can affect?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arnaud.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.update_resources_interval
>>> [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/large-scale/+/886166
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230619/5631357f/attachment.htm>