Hello, you mean this is the reason why the transient queues are not HA? (And thus not quorum when using quorums). This is still a problem to me, when you lose a rabbit from the cluster. The probability to lose messages is very high. So the probability to have an instance in error is also very high (as a public cloud provider, our api is used a lot, there is a lot of creation/deletion of instances). Enabling HA for transient queues is helping in that situation. Le 16 juin 2023 16:06:49 GMT+02:00, "Nguyễn Hữu Khôi" <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com> a écrit : >Hello. >I think that is the reason why people don't use all quorum queue. > >https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1607830 > >Nguyen Huu Khoi > > >On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 4:55 PM Arnaud Morin <arnaud.morin at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey team, >> >> I'd like to understand the stakes behing the update_resources_interval >> parameter ([1]) >> >> We decided on our side to increase this value from 60sec to 600sec (see >> [2]). >> >> What I understand is that is will "delay" the update of metrics on nova >> side. >> I mostly think that these metrics are used by filter scheduler to select >> the best host when scheduling. >> >> Is there anything else it can affect? >> >> Cheers, >> Arnaud. >> >> >> [1] >> https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.update_resources_interval >> [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/large-scale/+/886166 >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230618/fb33b858/attachment.htm>