Open Stack

Hi Andy,

Thank you for the response. May I know which version you are currently
using ?

We can keep puppet-murano for now as there is a user(or some users,
hopefully) using the module.
However please note there is no functional test coverage(integration
tests/acceptance tests) to test
actual deployments in our CI. We probably better try enabling a few tests
to test actual deployments.
I'll look into it when I get time, and might ask for your help in case I
face any problems.

Thank you,
Takashi

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 6:12 PM Andy Botting <andy at andybotting.com> wrote:

> Hi Takashi,
>
> We're still using puppet-murano. If there's any specific issues, I'd
> be happy to look into them, but it's working OK for us currently.
>
> cheers,
> Andy
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 19:36, Takashi Kajinami <tkajinam at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > In Puppet OpenStack projects we have multiple modules to support
> multiple OpenStack components.
> > However unfortunately some of these have not been attracting enough
> interest from developers and
> > have been unmaintained.
> >
> > During the past few cycles we retired a few incomplete modules but I'm
> wondering if we can retire
> > a few unmaintained modules now, to reduce our maintenance/release effort.
> >
> > I checked the modules we have currently, and I think the following three
> can be first candidates.
> > - puppet-murano
> > - puppet-rally
> > - puppet-tacker
> >
> > We haven't seen any feedback from users about these modules for a long
> time. Most of the changes
> > for the past 2~3 years are proposed by me but I am not really using
> these components.
> >
> > These modules do not have proper test coverage and it's quite difficult
> for us to catch any breakage and
> > honestly I'm not quite sure these modules can work properly with the
> latest code. Actually we've often
> > caught up with the latest requirements several years after the change
> was made in the software side,
> > and I'm afraid these are not well-maintained.
> >
> > eg.
> >  - support for tacker-conductor was added 4 years after the service was
> added
> >  - we didn't noticed that the openstack plugin was split out from the
> core rally package for several years
> >
> > If anybody has concerns with retiring these modules, then please let us
> know. If we don't hear any objections
> > for a while, then I'll start proposing changes for project retirement.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Takashi
> > --
> > ----------
> > Takashi Kajinami
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230130/5c3109c5/attachment-0001.htm>