Open Stack

Thanks for the heads up. I checked the source images, and they are fine.

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:24 PM Pierre Riteau <pierre at stackhpc.com> wrote:

> Hi Rafael,
>
> I believe this is caused by Ubuntu Cloud Archive (UCA) not providing
> packages for CloudKitty:
> https://openstack-ci-reports.ubuntu.com/reports/cloud-archive/yoga_versions.html
> As a result, Kolla installs cloudkitty packages from the focal universe
> repository, which provide version 11.0.1:
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/cloudkitty-processor
> Installing a newer version of cloudkitty would require using a more recent
> version of Ubuntu… So for Kolla binary images, this would need to be fixed
> by UCA.
>
> Anyway, I would recommend switching to source images. Not only will you
> get the latest stable code, but also Kolla binary images are deprecated and
> will be removed in Zed.
>
> Cheers,
> Pierre Riteau (priteau)
>
> On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 14:18, Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I was checking the upstream containers for CloudKittty for Yoga release;
>> and, I noticed that the CloudKitty containers are using version 11.0.1,
>> which is not the Yoga version of CloudKitty. I also checked Xena, and the
>> same thing happens there. Do we need to define these component versions
>> somewhere else for the Kolla containers that are built upstream?
>>
>> --
>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>
>

-- 
Rafael Weingärtner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220505/ae75b767/attachment.htm>