[os-brick][nova][cinder][glance] Question about lock_path
radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com
Thu Feb 3 10:43:29 UTC 2022
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 10:53, Gorka Eguileor <geguileo at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/02, Radosław Piliszek wrote:
> > Hello Fellow OpenStackers!
> > I have noticed os-brick started using the file locks (in lock_path) to
> > avoid race conditions.
> > I have a question regarding that lock_path - it seems all the cases I
> > have found use separate lock_paths per service, yet the problematic
> > cases listed in the bug report (and the commit message of ) suggest
> > that, in case of co-hosted nova-compute, glance-api, cinder-volume and
> > cinder-backup services (or any combination thereof), the lock_path
> > should be shared.
> > Should the deployment projects adapt to actually fix the race condition issue?
> >  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/814139
> > Kind regards,
> > -yoctozepto
> Yes, it is the deployment tool's responsibility to set the right
> lock_path value on the following cases:
> - Hyperconverged deployment: Cinder-volume or cinder-backup are running
> on the same node as thee nova-compute service.
> - Glance is using Cinder as a backend.
Thank you, Gorka, for confirming.
> In all other cases it doesn't matter the value of the lock_path since
> there only 1 project that uses os-brick, even if it has multiple
> processes and/or services using it as is the case in cinder-volume and
> cinder-backup running on the same host or cinder-backup running multiple
Yeah, that I figured out. :-)
More information about the openstack-discuss