On 2022-04-29 21:39:18 +0200 (+0200), Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > Maybe a best of breed approach would be to have both, like Ubuntu > releases. It does not solve the time consuming and others issues > regarding naming choices but I see it as a good consensual > solution at this time. That's essentially the status quo. The currently approved (and recently revised) process says we have both a release name and year-based version number: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/release-naming.html The proposal under discussion now is to drop the name, so only the number remains: https://review.opendev.org/839897 -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220429/731a44ca/attachment.sig>