[Zuul] [neutron] Errors in the jobs definitions and EOL of some old networking-midonet branches

Slawek Kaplonski skaplons at redhat.com
Mon Apr 11 12:30:52 UTC 2022


On poniedziałek, 11 kwietnia 2022 14:18:12 CEST Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2022-04-11 11:51:46 +0200 (+0200), Slawek Kaplonski wrote:
> [...]
> > will it be ok if such branch will be EOL to get rid of the Zuul
> > configuration errors warnings? Or should we somehow force to merge
> > those patches first to get rid of the errors
> [...]
> Simply tagging the branch and removing it (standard EOL practice for
> the release managers) should suffice. There's no need to correct the
> configuration on branches if they're being deleted.

Thanks for confirmation. That's what I thought but I wanted to be sure :)


Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220411/9109e671/attachment.sig>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list