[release][PTL] broken gates and stuck releases
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Fri Sep 17 14:31:37 UTC 2021
---- On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:51:54 -0500 Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote ----
> On 2021-09-17 12:41:17 +0200 (+0200), Herve Beraud wrote:
> > Our current solution is to pull openstack/governance from git
> > source instead of from pypi. By doing that we will pull the fixed
> > version from opendev git and we will unblock our gates. In this
> > way, we will be able to restart to merge patches and release
> > deliverables.
> > We currently wait for some feedback from the infra team to help us
> > to force merging the needed fixes by using their gerrit super
> > admin rights, hence, bypassing the catch-22 situation.
> By the time I was around, a solution was found which involved merely
> adjusting the release project requirements list, so no action was
> needed outside normal code review workflow.
> > This situation highlighted the cross dependency between these two
> > repos (governance and releases) and I don't think that this is
> > something healthy. I propose to keep pulling the governance repo
> > from git source even after we will fix the catch-22 situation. Any
> > opinions?
> The "proper" way to do this is to declare openstack/governance in
> the required-projects lists for the jobs which are using it, and
> then the tox role from zuul-jobs will know to consume it from
> locally supplied source instead of fetching it from PyPI. This also
> allows Zuul to handle cross-repository dependencies properly, so a
> requirements change would be able to successfully Depends-On some
> proposed change in governance even before it's merged.
+1, and using data directly from governance repo make more sense than pip.
I thought we release governance only for election scripts. can we remove governance
release dependencies also, I have not checked those election scripts yet? and after
that, we stop releasing governance itself and everyone can use it from the source.
> Jeremy Stanley
More information about the openstack-discuss