[tc][docs] missing documentation

Peter Matulis peter.matulis at canonical.com
Fri Oct 1 18:00:31 UTC 2021

How does the Projects page get populated?

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:56 AM Előd Illés <elod.illes at est.tech> wrote:

> Hi,
> With this mail I want to raise multiple topics towards TC, related to
> Documentation (SIG):
> * This week I had the task in the Release Management Team to notify the
> Documentation (Technical Writing) SIG to apply their processes to create
> the new release series landing pages for docs.openstack.org. Currently
> the SIG is chaired by Stephen Finucane, but he won't be around in the
> next cycle so the Technical Writing SIG will remain without a chair and
> active members.
> * Another point that came up is that a lot of projects are missing
> documentation in Victoria and Wallaby releases as they don't even have a
> single patch merged on their stable/victoria or stable/wallaby branches,
> not even the auto-generated patches (showing the lack of stable
> maintainers of the given projects). For example compare Ussuri [1] and
> Wallaby [2] projects page.
>      - one proposed solution for this is to auto-merge the
> auto-generated patches (but on the other hand this does not solve the
> issue of lacking active maintainers)
> Thanks,
> Előd
> [1] https://docs.openstack.org/ussuri/projects.html
> [2] https://docs.openstack.org/wallaby/projects.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20211001/89f3bafc/attachment.htm>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list