Open Stack

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:22 PM Tom Barron <tpb at dyncloud.net> wrote:

> On 01/03/21 11:46 +0200, Marios Andreou wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:38 PM Marios Andreou <marios at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:40 PM Marios Andreou <marios at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> it's been ~ 2 months now since my initial mail about $subject [1] and
> >>> just under a month since my last bump on the thread [2] and I haven't
> heard
> >>> any objections so far.
> >>>
> >>> So I think it's now appropriate to move forward with [3] which tags the
> >>> latest commits to the stable/rocky branch of all tripleo-repos [4] as
> >>> 'rock-eol' (except archived things like instack/tripleo-ui).
> >>>
> >>> Once it merges we will no longer be able to land anything into
> >>> stable/rocky for all tripleo repos and the stable/rocky branch will be
> >>> deleted.
> >>>
> >>> So, last chance! If you object please go and -1 the patch at [3] and/or
> >>> reply here
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >(explicitly added some folks into cc for attention please)
> >
> >Thanks to Elod, I just updated/posted v2 of the proposal at
> >https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/774244
> >
> >Harald, Slawek, Tom, o/ please check the comments at
> >
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/774244/1/deliverables/rocky/tripleo-heat-templates.yaml#62
> >.
> >
> >The question is - do you really need this on stable/rocky in and of
> itself,
> >or, rather because that branch is still active, and we needed it on the
> >previous, i.e. queens?
> >
> >Basically sanity check again so there is no confusion later ;) do you
> folks
> >object to us declaring stable/rocky as EOL?
>
> I have no objection to declaring stable/rocky as EOL - the change I
> proposed there was part of a series of backports from master back to
> stable/queens.   I posted it to stable/rocky along the way since that
> branch was not EOL and I didn't want to leave a gap in the series of
> backports.
>
>

ACK thanks for confirming Tom




> >
> >thank you!
> >
> >regards, marios
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> bump - there has been some discussion on the proposal at
> >> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/774244 which is now
> >> resolved.
> >>
> >> I just removed my blocking workflow -1 at releases/+/774244 so really
> >> really last chance now ;)
> >>
> >> regards, marios
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> thanks, marios
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019338.html
> >>> [2]
> >>>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-January/019860.html
> >>> [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/774244
> >>> [4] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html
> >>>
> >>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210301/eadc0494/attachment.html>