[E] [ironic] Review Jams

Zachary Buhman zachary.buhman at verizonmedia.com
Tue Feb 9 20:47:33 UTC 2021

I thought the 09 Feb 2021 review jam was highly valuable.

Without the discussions we had, I think the "Secure RBAC" patch set would
be unapproachable for me. For example, having knowledge of the (new)
oslo-policy features that the patches make use of seems to be a requirement
for deeply understanding the changes. As a direct result of the review jam
[0], I feel that I have enough understanding and comfortability to make
valuable review feedback on these patches.

[0] and also having read/reviewed the secure-rbac spec previously, to be

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:10 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger at gmail.com>

> In the Ironic team's recent mid-cycle call, we discussed the need to
> return to occasionally having review jams in order to help streamline
> the review process. In other words, get eyes on a change in parallel
> and be able to discuss the change. The goal is to help get people on
> the same page in terms of what and why. Be on hand to answer questions
> or back-fill context. This is to hopefully avoid the more iterative
> back and forth nature of code review, which can draw out a long chain
> of patches. As always, the goal is not perfection, but forward
> movement especially for complex changes.
> We've established two time windows that will hopefully not to be too
> hard for some contributors to make it to. It doesn't need to be
> everyone, but it would help for at least some people whom actively
> review or want to actively participate in reviewing, or whom are even
> interested in a feature to join us for our meeting.
> I've added an entry on to our wiki page to cover this, with the
> current agenda and anticipated review jam topic schedule. The tl;dr is
> we will use meetpad[1] and meet on Mondays at 2 PM UTC and Tuesdays at
> 6 PM UTC. The hope is to to enable some overlap of reviewers. If
> people are interested in other times, please bring this up in the
> weekly meeting or on the mailing list.
> I'm not sending out calendar invites for this. Yet. :)
> See everyone next week!
> -Julia
> [0]:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Meetings_Ironic-23Review-5FJams&d=DwIBaQ&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=OsbscIvhVDRWHpDZtO7nXdqGCfPHirpVEemMwL8l5tw&m=S4p8gD_wQlpR_rvzdqGkdq574-DkUsgBRet9-k3RpVg&s=gVApbMsmNPVlfYreqkQe4yKFxC66U6D8nFc_TwjW-FE&e=
> [1]:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__meetpad.opendev.org_ironic&d=DwIBaQ&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=OsbscIvhVDRWHpDZtO7nXdqGCfPHirpVEemMwL8l5tw&m=S4p8gD_wQlpR_rvzdqGkdq574-DkUsgBRet9-k3RpVg&s=iHBy7h99FQZ6Xb_fN2Hv3HZXIANl6BzR867jblUJvsk&e=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210209/cccf1d12/attachment.html>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list