Open Stack

Can we expand the spec for Cappuccinos and Lattes? Oh and maybe Pan Au
Chocolate?

Amy (spotz)

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 5:31 PM James Penick <jpenick at gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps we should break this down into a subset of projects, one for
> grinding beans, one for extracting coffee, and maybe a microservice for
> handling milk or dairy based alternatives?
>
> I think we can also all agree that cold brew drinks are *completely* out
> of scope and should be implemented in another service.
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:59 PM Jay Faulkner <jay.faulkner at verizonmedia.com>
> wrote:
>
>> OpenStack is about producing large amounts of homogenous instances. This
>> sort of espresso-machine pandering will just lead us down a path of
>> supporting all kinds of lattes, mochas, and macchiatos -- not even to get
>> started on the flavor syrups and steamed milk.
>>
>> We have to focus on managing large pots of coffee, so that people can
>> drink and know the next cup they get will be the exact same. We're building
>> a homogenous coffee environment, we can't be supporting every milk, style,
>> and flavor syrup in the world.
>>
>> -
>> Jay Faulkner
>>
>> P.S. Don't even try to sneak any of those dark roast Starbucks beans past
>> the refcoffee tests. That kind of bitterness exceeds our API spec.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:50 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We shouldn't forget the classic drip makers that Operators tend to
>>> have in their facilities.
>>>
>>> Granted, I think they will need to send them all through cleaning once
>>> the pandemic is over.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:37 PM James Penick <jpenick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I completely support this. However are you considering other options,
>>> such as pour-over coffee machines? Not every deployer is able to consume
>>> espresso!
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:54 PM Jacob Anders <janders at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi There,
>>> >>
>>> >> I was discussing this RFE with Julia and we decided it would be great
>>> to get some feedback on it from the wider community, ideally by the end of
>>> today. Apologies for the short notice. Here's the story:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__storyboard.openstack.org_-23-21_story_2008791&d=DwIBaQ&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=NKR1jXf8to59hDGraABDUb4djWcsAXM11_v4c7uz0Tg&m=PCP6by2W8jflO0mp6YeO5RmQQmP7uaT6aHvdRZ3C2V0&s=AbjZNK66m1pUKose0j2gZNtDgFUf5LYyS9Qz8JAfqr4&e=
>>> >>
>>> >> What are your thoughts on this? Please comment in the Story or just
>>> reply to thread.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you,
>>> >> Jacob
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210401/25581941/attachment-0001.html>