Hi, Thanks Daniel for taking care of this point and contributing to it. Daniel already opened some reviews on this subject : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/758028/ This can be tracked using topic "*setuptools-explicit*" ( https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:setuptools-explicit) Hervé Beraud made a remark on review 758028: ~~~ The rationale behind these changes LGTM. However I've some concerns related to pbr: pbr rely on setuptools [1] and still support python2.7 [2] setuptools 50.3.0 only support python3 [3] So I wonder if we should also define a version which support python2.7 to avoid issues on with this context. setuptools dropped the support of python 2 with 45.0.0 [4] so we could use the version 44.1.1 [5] for this use case. [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/pbr/src/branch/master/setup.py#L16 [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/pbr/src/branch/master/setup.cfg#L25 [3] https://pypi.org/project/setuptools/50.3.0/ [4] https://setuptools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/history.html#v45-0-0 [5] https://pypi.org/project/setuptools/44.1.1/ ~~~ I think it could be worth defining the version or a rule (py2 vs py3) here before performing a large series of patches. Cheers, *SEBASTIEN BOYRON* Red Hat On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:31 AM Daniel Bengtsson <dbengt at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Le 02/10/2020 à 15:40, Sebastien Boyron a écrit : > > I am opening the discussion and pointing to this right now, but I think > > we should wait for the Wallaby release before doing anything on that > > point to insert this modification > > into the regular development cycle. On a release point of view all the > > changes related to this proposal will be released through the classic > > release process > > and they will be landed with other projects changes, in other words it > > will not require a range of specific releases for projects. > It's a good idea. I agree explicit is better than implicit. I'm > interesting to help on this subject. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201015/2952a966/attachment-0001.html>