[release][masakari] - [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/masakari-monitors for ref refs/tags/(7.0.1|8.0.2|9.0.1) failed
Herve Beraud
hberaud at redhat.com
Fri Nov 13 15:55:57 UTC 2020
Notice that this patch will face the same error too
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762402/2
I'm going to hold this one until a fix is merged on the project side. Don't
forget to update the sha when the issue is fixed.
Le ven. 13 nov. 2020 à 16:04, Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com> a
écrit :
> ---- On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 06:45:54 -0600 Herve Beraud <hberaud at redhat.com>
> wrote ----
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 13 nov. 2020 à 13:17, Radosław Piliszek <
> radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com> a écrit :
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:09 PM Herve Beraud <hberaud at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the heads up.
> > >
> > > Notice that I just submitted a series of patches [1] to fix all
> masakari's stable branches, feel free to abandon these patches if they
> aren't needed anymore.
> > >
> > > [1]
> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:fix-libvirt-focal+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
> > >
> >
> > Ah, sorry, did not notice that.
> > I just went with [1] removing the pkg to avoid the naming issue
> altogether.
> >
> > No problem
> >
> > My question is whether we could detect such issues more proactively?
> >
> > Good question... I don't think that this kind of a check should be
> hosted on the release management side.Here our issue is more an environment
> issue, It's due to the fact that we decided to run the job
> `publish-openstack-artifacts` on ubuntu-focal, so to detect this kind of
> issue early I think that jobs on the projects side should rely on
> ubuntu-focal too. I'm not a Zuul expert and I don't know if it is possible
> to add a condition based on the branches (per example) to choose the right
> env (focal or not). By following this way I guess it could be possible to
> fail early on the project side, and it could allow you to fix this kind of
> issue well before proposing a new release. In other words, if projects's
> jobs env are aligned with release management our job we could catch them
> early.
>
> `publish-openstack-artifacts` job should not run for Focal for the stable
> gate and running it on Focal from Victoria onwards (like all other common
> jobs).
>
> -gmann
>
>
> > We have other scenarios to consider. These are when no patches haven't
> been merged since a while on projects side, and where a release is
> proposed, in this case even if environments are aligned, in this case we
> aren't able to detect this kind of issue, and they will continue to occur
> during publication, as in this case.
> > It could be worth it to involve the infra team to see how to fail early.
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > [1] https://review.opendev.org/762637
> >
> > -yoctozepto
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hervé BeraudSenior Software Engineer at Red Hatirc: hberaudhttps://
> github.com/4383/https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+
> > Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+
> > RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP
> > F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G
> > 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g
> > glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw
> > m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ
> > hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0
> > qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y
> > F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3
> > B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O
> > v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o
> > =ECSj
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
>
--
Hervé Beraud
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
irc: hberaud
https://github.com/4383/
https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ECSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201113/0bb2d3fb/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list