[qa][cinder][devstack] proposed governance changes for some devstack plugins

Ghanshyam Mann gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Wed Mar 4 22:40:39 UTC 2020

 ---- On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:53:00 -0600 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com> wrote ----
 > Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,
 > The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.
 > 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the 
 > maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0].  Currently, the 
 > devstack-plugin-ceph-core is
 > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members
 > The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd like to 
 > replace them by including the cinder-core group.

+1. This is good diea and make sense, I will do the change. 

 > 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the 
 > maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1].  Currently, the 
 > devstack-plugin-nfs-core is
 > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members
 > It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the 
 > individual members with the cinder-core group.  We also propose that 
 > devstack-core be added as an included group.
 > 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new devstack plugin:
 >      openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas
 > This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being introduced 
 > as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in Victoria.  Our 
 > plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core included groups 
 > for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.

+1. You want this under Cinder governance or under QA ?

 > 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs repo be moved 
 > back into the 'openstack' namespace?

If this is usable plugin for nfs testing (I am not aware if we have any other) then
it make sense to bring it to openstack governance.
Same question here, do you want to put this under Cinder governance or QA. 

Those plugins under QA governance also ok for me with your proposal of calloborative maintainance by
devstack-core and cinder-core.


 > Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.
 > [0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph
 > [1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs
 > [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list