[qa][cinder][devstack] proposed governance changes for some devstack plugins

Brian Rosmaita rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 19:53:00 UTC 2020

Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,

The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.

1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the 
maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0].  Currently, the 
devstack-plugin-ceph-core is
The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd like to 
replace them by including the cinder-core group.

2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the 
maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1].  Currently, the 
devstack-plugin-nfs-core is
It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the 
individual members with the cinder-core group.  We also propose that 
devstack-core be added as an included group.

3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new devstack plugin:
This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being introduced 
as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in Victoria.  Our 
plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core included groups 
for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.

4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs repo be moved 
back into the 'openstack' namespace?

Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.

[0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph
[1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list