hi, sorry i can't attend today. some inline comments below. On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:53 PM Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the agenda for tomorrows drivers meeting. > I want to discuss few RFEs there: > > - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1880532 - L3 Router should support > ECMP - this is continuation of the discussion from previous meeting. There is > also spec proposed for that one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729532/ api-wise, i guess we need to wait for an answer to your question at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729532/24/specs/ussuri/l3-router-support-ecmp.rst@68 > > - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1751040 - Extended resources should > not always calculate all attributes - old RFE but we should discuss that > finally, > > - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1882804 - allow replacing the QoS > policy of bound port - this one is follow up after nova-neutron discussion > during the PTG. TBH I don't think we will need a lot of discussion about that > but still it needs an approval. > > There are also 2 items in "On demand agenda": > > - (ralonsoh) [RFE] Optional NUMA affinity for neutron ports (commented in the > PTG and scheduled to be commented here before). BZ: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791834. No LP or BP created, this > is just to present and discuss the idea of **using or not the QoS API** for > this RFE. is this just about having a way to pass necessary info to nova? > > - (slaweq) We are deprecating neutron-fwaas. What with the API-REF? > It's question from the ML > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015508.html i'm not sure what he is asking. i guess he can maintain the api extension in his plugin if he wants. > > > As agenda is pretty busy, I would like to start with On Demand agenda tomorrow > and then continue with RFEs according to how much time we will have. See You on > the meeting tomorrow. > > -- > Slawek Kaplonski > Senior software engineer > Red Hat >