Open Stack

Hi,

Thx Takashi for Your comments about it.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:02:42PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
> 
> sorry i can't attend today.
> some inline comments below.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:53 PM Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the agenda for tomorrows drivers meeting.
> > I want to discuss few RFEs there:
> >
> > - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1880532 - L3 Router should support
> >   ECMP - this is continuation of the discussion from previous meeting. There is
> >   also spec proposed for that one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729532/
> 
> api-wise, i guess we need to wait for an answer to your question at
> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729532/24/specs/ussuri/l3-router-support-ecmp.rst@68

We will discuss that on next meeting.

> 
> >
> > - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1751040 - Extended resources should
> >   not always calculate all attributes - old RFE but we should discuss that
> >   finally,
> >
> > - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1882804 - allow replacing the QoS
> >   policy of bound port - this one is follow up after nova-neutron discussion
> >   during the PTG. TBH I don't think we will need a lot of discussion about that
> >   but still it needs an approval.
> >
> > There are also 2 items in "On demand agenda":
> >
> > - (ralonsoh) [RFE] Optional NUMA affinity for neutron ports (commented in the
> >   PTG and scheduled to be commented here before). BZ:
> >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791834. No LP or BP created, this
> >   is just to present and discuss the idea of **using or not the QoS API** for
> >   this RFE.
> 
> is this just about having a way to pass necessary info to nova?

In general yes. We decided to go with new API. Rodolfo will propose spec for
that.

> 
> >
> > - (slaweq) We are deprecating neutron-fwaas. What with the API-REF?
> >   It's question from the ML
> >   http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015508.html
> 
> i'm not sure what he is asking.
> i guess he can maintain the api extension in his plugin if he wants.

They have own custom implementation of fwaas API and they want to keep it as
official API and to keep e.g. support for it in OSC. We agreed to do it like
that.

> 
> >
> >
> > As agenda is pretty busy, I would like to start with On Demand agenda tomorrow
> > and then continue with RFEs according to how much time we will have. See You on
> > the meeting tomorrow.
> >
> > --
> > Slawek Kaplonski
> > Senior software engineer
> > Red Hat
> >
> 

-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Senior software engineer
Red Hat