Open Stack

On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 16:43, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks for the detailed response Sean. I don't have an issue with the
> > cycle model - Ironic is still tied to the cyclical release model. The
> > part that I disagree with is the requirement to create an intermediary
> > release. It shouldn't be a problem if bifrost doesn't make a feature
> > release between Train and Ussuri, we'll just do a final Ussuri
> > release. It's the intermediary I'd like to be optional, rather than
> > the final cycle release.
> >
> I would suggest switching these to cycle-with-rc then. There is one
> release candidate that has to happen just before the final release for
> the cycle, but that's mainly to make sure everything is in good shape
> before we declare it done. That sounds like it might fit better with
> what the team wants to do here.

But what if we want to create a feature release mid-cycle? Some cycles
we do, some we don't.