Open Stack

It sure is, we as well abandoned the MongoDB backend for Gnocchi which 
works pretty well.

Would be a shame if a migration back would be required, maybe we can get 
a discussion going on a more
long-term solution as was discussed when talking about the future of 
Ceilometer.

Supporting Gnocchi or moving to another open source project as a storage 
backend that is stable and maintained.
There were (and still is? Though unofficial out-of-tree) storage 
backends for Ceilometer that publishes to InfluxDB.

I were never able to follow-up on the meetings (I probably missed a lot 
of it) regarding the Ceilometer roadmap [1].

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/telemetry-train-roadmap

On 11/19/19 10:29 AM, Blom, Merlin, NMU-OI wrote:
>
> Thanks for your work on ceilometer!
>
> The gnocchi situation is realy sad.
>
> We implemented solutions on Gnocchi and ceilometer.
>
> In my opinion you abandoned the mongodb support for performance 
> reasons and now you are going back to it?
>
> Has mongodb made any significant performance improvements for time 
> series data?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Merlin
>
> *Von:*Lingxian Kong <anlin.kong at gmail.com>
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 19. November 2019 10:03
> *An:* Radosław Piliszek <radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [gnocchi][telemetry][ceilometer][cloudkitty] Gnocchi 
> unmaintained
>
> We (ceilometer team) will probably add Ceilometer API and mongodb 
> support back, considering the current Gnocchi project situation. 
> However, Gnocchi will still be supported as a publisher in Ceilometer.
>
> -
>
> Best regards,
> Lingxian Kong
>
> Catalyst Cloud
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:54 PM Radosław Piliszek 
> <radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com <mailto:radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello Folks,
>
>     It looks like gnocchi is "officially" marked as unmaintained:
>     https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/issues/1049
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_gnocchixyz_gnocchi_issues_1049&d=DwMFaQ&c=vo2ie5TPcLdcgWuLVH4y8lsbGPqIayH3XbK3gK82Oco&r=hTUN4-Trlb-8Fh11dR6m5VD1uYA15z7v9WL8kYigkr8&m=czRC3qwwRqT3qKzfXMSVl78G4Sk8QVwT93okCgkBe34&s=Ob7yLjlWUAz9-8oMikC_QU9ivZBvtBKkqqFEvceGGM0&e=>
>
>     Has there been any discussion regarding how it affects OpenStack
>     projects? And/or are there any plans to amend this situation?
>
>     -yoctozepto
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20191119/82d57712/attachment.html>