Open Stack

Hi Matt,

I agree, your concern is valid.
I have been working in glance since Icehouse and aware about stable branch
guidelines. Given the opportunity, I will try my best to justify my
selection.

Thanks & Best Regards,

Abhishek Kekane


On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:29 AM Matt Riedemann <mriedemos at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/12/2019 2:17 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> > we are currently understaffed in glance-stable-maint.  Plus, he's the
> > current Glance PTL.
>
> glance-stable-maint is understaffed yes. I ran a reviewstats report on
> glance stable branch reviews over the last 180 days:
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/786058/
>
> Abhishek has only done 3 stable branch reviews in 6 months which is
> pretty low but to be fair maybe there aren't that many open reviews on
> stable branches for glance and the other existing glance-stable-maint
> cores don't have a lot more reviews either, so maybe that's just par for
> the course.
>
> As for being core on master or being PTL, as you probably know, that
> doesn't really mean much when it comes to stable branch reviews, which
> is more about the stable branch guidelines. Nova has a few stable branch
> cores that aren't core on master because they adhere to the guidelines
> and do a lot of stable branch reviews.
>
> Anyway, I'm OK trusting Abhishek here and adding him to the
> glance-stable-maint team. Things are such these days that beggars can't
> really be choosers.
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20191114/4f4c6bbc/attachment.html>