[ospurge] looking for project owners / considering adoption
adriant at catalyst.net.nz
Mon Nov 4 03:00:08 UTC 2019
Also of potential interest is our own internal variant of project
Note, a recent thing we ran into was a lack of support for Swift Bulk
deletion... which we are now turning on and fixing, because deleting a
project with 2mil + objects one by one is... slow.
On 31/10/19 2:26 am, Adam Harwell wrote:
> That's too bad that you won't be at the summit, but I think there may
> still be some discussion planned about this topic.
> Yeah, I understand completely about priorities and such internally.
> Same for me... It just happens that this IS priority work for us right
> now. :)
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 07:48 Adrian Turjak <adriant at catalyst.net.nz
> <mailto:adriant at catalyst.net.nz>> wrote:
> My apologies I missed this email.
> Sadly I won't be at the summit this time around. There may be some
> public cloud focused discussions, and some of those often have
> this topic come up. Also if Monty from the SDK team is around, I'd
> suggest finding him and having a chat.
> I'll help if I can but we are swamped with internal work and I
> can't dedicate much time to do upstream work that isn't urgent. :(
> On 17/10/19 8:48 am, Adam Harwell wrote:
>> That's interesting -- we have already started working to add
>> features and improve ospurge, and it seems like a plenty useful
>> tool for our needs, but I think I agree that it would be nice to
>> have that functionality built into the sdk. I might be able to
>> help with both, since one is immediately useful and we (like
>> everyone) have deadlines to meet, and the other makes sense to me
>> as a possible future direction that could be more widely supported.
>> Will you or someone else be hosting and discussion about this at
>> the Shanghai summit? I'll be there and would be happy to join and
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, 22:04 Adrian Turjak
>> <adriant at catalyst.net.nz <mailto:adriant at catalyst.net.nz>> wrote:
>> I tried to get a community goal to do project deletion per
>> project, but
>> we ended up deciding that a community goal wasn't ideal
>> unless we did
>> build a bulk delete API in each service:
>> What we decided on, but didn't get a chance to work on, was
>> into the OpenstackSDK OS-purge like functionality, as well as
>> functionality (of all project resources to be deleted). That
>> way we
>> could have per project per resource deletion logic, and all
>> of that
>> defined in the SDK.
>> I was up for doing some of the work, but ended up swamped
>> with internal
>> work and just didn't drive or push for the deletion work
>> If you want to do something useful, don't pursue OS-Purge,
>> help us add
>> that official functionality to the SDK, and then we can push
>> for bulk
>> deletion APIs in each project to make resource deletion more
>> I'd be happy to help with the work, and Monty on the SDK team
>> will most
>> likely be happy to as well. :)
>> On 1/10/19 11:48 am, Adam Harwell wrote:
>> > I haven't seen much activity on this project in a while,
>> and it's been
>> > moved to opendev/x since the opendev migration... Who is
>> the current
>> > owner of this project? Is there anyone who actually is
>> maintaining it,
>> > or would mind if others wanted to adopt the project to move
>> it forward?
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Adam Harwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss