[ospurge] looking for project owners / considering adoption

Tobias Rydberg tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.eu
Sat Nov 2 08:19:14 UTC 2019


A Forum session is planned for this topic, Monday 11:40. Suites perfect 
to continue the discussions there as well.



Tobias Rydberg
Senior Developer
Twitter & IRC: tobberydberg

www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com

ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED

On 2019-10-30 15:43, Artem Goncharov wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> Since I need this now as well I will start working on implementation 
> how it was agreed (in SDK and in OSC) during last summit by mid of 
> November. There is no need for discussing this further, it just need 
> to be implemented. Sad that we got no progress in half a year.
> Regards,
> Artem (gtema).
>> On 30. Oct 2019, at 14:26, Adam Harwell <flux.adam at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:flux.adam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> That's too bad that you won't be at the summit, but I think there may 
>> still be some discussion planned about this topic.
>> Yeah, I understand completely about priorities and such internally. 
>> Same for me... It just happens that this IS priority work for us 
>> right now. :)
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 07:48 Adrian Turjak <adriant at catalyst.net.nz 
>> <mailto:adriant at catalyst.net.nz>> wrote:
>>     My apologies I missed this email.
>>     Sadly I won't be at the summit this time around. There may be
>>     some public cloud focused discussions, and some of those often
>>     have this topic come up. Also if Monty from the SDK team is
>>     around, I'd suggest finding him and having a chat.
>>     I'll help if I can but we are swamped with internal work and I
>>     can't dedicate much time to do upstream work that isn't urgent. :(
>>     On 17/10/19 8:48 am, Adam Harwell wrote:
>>>     That's interesting -- we have already started working to add
>>>     features and improve ospurge, and it seems like a plenty useful
>>>     tool for our needs, but I think I agree that it would be nice to
>>>     have that functionality built into the sdk. I might be able to
>>>     help with both, since one is immediately useful and we (like
>>>     everyone) have deadlines to meet, and the other makes sense to
>>>     me as a possible future direction that could be more widely
>>>     supported.
>>>     Will you or someone else be hosting and discussion about this at
>>>     the Shanghai summit? I'll be there and would be happy to join
>>>     and discuss.
>>>         --Adam
>>>     On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, 22:04 Adrian Turjak
>>>     <adriant at catalyst.net.nz <mailto:adriant at catalyst.net.nz>> wrote:
>>>         I tried to get a community goal to do project deletion per
>>>         project, but
>>>         we ended up deciding that a community goal wasn't ideal
>>>         unless we did
>>>         build a bulk delete API in each service:
>>>         https://review.opendev.org/#/c/639010/
>>>         https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goal-project-deletion
>>>         https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-Deletion-of-resources
>>>         https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-Train-PublicCloudWG-brainstorming
>>>         What we decided on, but didn't get a chance to work on, was
>>>         building
>>>         into the OpenstackSDK OS-purge like functionality, as well
>>>         as reporting
>>>         functionality (of all project resources to be deleted). That
>>>         way we
>>>         could have per project per resource deletion logic, and all
>>>         of that
>>>         defined in the SDK.
>>>         I was up for doing some of the work, but ended up swamped
>>>         with internal
>>>         work and just didn't drive or push for the deletion work
>>>         upstream.
>>>         If you want to do something useful, don't pursue OS-Purge,
>>>         help us add
>>>         that official functionality to the SDK, and then we can push
>>>         for bulk
>>>         deletion APIs in each project to make resource deletion more
>>>         pleasant.
>>>         I'd be happy to help with the work, and Monty on the SDK
>>>         team will most
>>>         likely be happy to as well. :)
>>>         Cheers,
>>>         Adrian
>>>         On 1/10/19 11:48 am, Adam Harwell wrote:
>>>         > I haven't seen much activity on this project in a while,
>>>         and it's been
>>>         > moved to opendev/x since the opendev migration... Who is
>>>         the current
>>>         > owner of this project? Is there anyone who actually is
>>>         maintaining it,
>>>         > or would mind if others wanted to adopt the project to
>>>         move it forward?
>>>         >
>>>         > Thanks,
>>>         >    --Adam Harwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20191102/30d804ed/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4017 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20191102/30d804ed/attachment.bin>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list