> -----Original Message----- > From: Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:43 PM > To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OSC][PTG] Summary: many things to do! > > On 5/10/19 4:48 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > OpenStackClient held a session at the Denver PTG and despite not > > having much planned had plenty to talk about. Some of the highlights > > from the etherpad[0] are: > > Well, poo. Sorry I missed it. > > > * Aretm is working on changing the Image commands to use OpenStackSDK. > > This is the work described in the cycle goal proposal[1] that he is > > planning to do anyway. I support going ahead with this even without > > an SDK 1.0 release as it lets us remove glanceclient and some of its > > unique dependencies. > > > > * There was some discussion about image encryption and where the > > client-side bits of that may land. One option was to put it into > > os-brick; if that is where it winds up OSC will make that an optional > > dependency de to the number of other dependencies that will introduce. > > (ie, OSC currently uses very little of oslo, some of which brings in a > > number of things not otherwise needed client-side). > > We landed support for image signing in SDK: > > https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/i > mage/image_signer.py The old python-glanceclient has an option to download the image to a local file. I missed that when using the clouds.yaml-based approach that directly accesses the Glance API. Hope we can add that option to the openstacksdk-based client. Just my 2 cents. Regards, Sundar > > dt > > > > [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/train-ptg-osc > > [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/639376/ > > [2] this series starts at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657907/ > > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-osc-compute-api-gaps > > [4] > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/005783 > > .html > > > >