[uc][tc][ops] reviving osops- repos
jean-philippe at evrard.me
Tue Jun 11 11:55:37 UTC 2019
> Alternatively, I feel like a SIG (be it the Ops Docs SIG or a new
> "Operational tooling" SIG) would totally be a good idea to revive this.
> In that case we'd define the repository in .
> My personal preference would be for a new SIG, but whoever is signing up
> to work on this should definitely have the final say.
Agreed on having it inside OpenStack namespace, and code handled by a team/SIG/WG (with my preference being a SIG -- existing or not). When this team/SIG/WG retires, the repo would with it. It provides clean ownership, and clear cleanup when disbanding.
Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp)
More information about the openstack-discuss