[uc][tc][ops] reviving osops- repos

Thierry Carrez thierry at openstack.org
Mon Jun 3 12:01:06 UTC 2019

Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2019-05-31 10:24:36 -0400 (-0400), Erik McCormick wrote:
> [...]
>> there's a project [1].
>> So either:
>> A) Make a SIG out of that and assign the repos to the sig, or
>> B) Maybe add it under / rename the Ops Docs SIG [2] as it might bring
>> more eyes to both things which serve the same folks.
> [...]
> I'd also be perfectly fine with C) say that it's being vouched for
> by the UC through its Osops project, stick these repos in a list
> *somewhere* as a durable record of that, and let decisions about
> project vs. SIG decision be independent of the repository naming
> decision.

+2 to keep it under the openstack/ namespace one way or another.

As to what construct should "own" it, the closest thing we have that 
would match history would be a UC "team"[1] or "working group"[2], both 
of which have repositories defined in [3].

Alternatively, I feel like a SIG (be it the Ops Docs SIG or a new 
"Operational tooling" SIG) would totally be a good idea to revive this. 
In that case we'd define the repository in [4].

My personal preference would be for a new SIG, but whoever is signing up 
to work on this should definitely have the final say.


Thierry Carrez (ttx)

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list