Open Stack

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:46 AM Graham Hayes <gr at ham.ie> wrote:

> On 08/04/2019 17:11, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2019-04-08 18:04:39 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > [...]
> >> What defines those groups is not the software bits that they
> >> produce, but their overall goals (getting OpenStack to run on
> >> Windows, supporting PowerVM technology in OpenStack). The
> >> repositories that they maintain is just a means toward this larger
> >> end, and a lot of their work is actually done within existing
> >> repositories from other project teams.
> > [...]
> >
> > This brings up an interesting question, though. The contributors to
> > those Winstackers and PowerVMstackers repositories today are able to
> > vote in technical committee elections. Should we consider an
> > amendment to the charter to include contributors to SIG-owned
> > repositories in the TC electorate?
> >
>
> 100% yes.
>
> E.G. - Someone who contributes to the api-sig repos is as deserving of a
> vote for the TC as someone who commits to designate / glance / nova
> neutron.
>
> (I used api-sig as an example, as I think pretty much anyone who has
> committed there already had a vote due to other openstack commits, but
> if we are going to move into a situation where we would remove peoples
> ability to vote we should adjust our processes to avoid it).
>
> - Graham
>
>
>
FWIW - we have also tried to include SIG activity as criteria for AUC
status and voting in the UC election.

VW

-- 
Matt Van Winkle
Senior Manager, Software Engineering | Salesforce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190408/7529ca10/attachment-0001.html>