[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-25 Update

Matt Riedemann mriedemos at gmail.com
Tue Oct 23 21:40:59 UTC 2018

On 10/23/2018 1:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>> Yeah, but part of the reason for placeholders was consistency across all of
>> the services. I guess if there are never going to be upgrade checks in
>> adjutant then I could see skipping it, but otherwise I would prefer to at
>> least get the framework in place.
> +1
> Even if there is nothing to check at this point, I think having the facility
> there is a benefit for projects and scripts that are going to be consuming
> these checks. Having nothing to check, but having the status check there, is
> going to be better than everything needing to keep a list of which projects to
> run the checks on and which not.

Sure, that works for me as well. I'm not against adding placeholder/noop 
checks knowing that nothing is immediately obvious to replace those in 
Stein, but could be done later when the opportunity arises. If it's 
debatable on a per-project basis, then I'd defer to the core team for 
the project.




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list