Open Stack

On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 16:40 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 10/23/2018 1:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > > Yeah, but part of the reason for placeholders was consistency
> > > across all of
> > > the services. I guess if there are never going to be upgrade
> > > checks in
> > > adjutant then I could see skipping it, but otherwise I would
> > > prefer to at
> > > least get the framework in place.
> > > 
> > +1
> > 
> > Even if there is nothing to check at this point, I think having the
> > facility
> > there is a benefit for projects and scripts that are going to be
> > consuming
> > these checks. Having nothing to check, but having the status check
> > there, is
> > going to be better than everything needing to keep a list of which
> > projects to
> > run the checks on and which not.
> > 
> 
> Sure, that works for me as well. I'm not against adding
> placeholder/noop 
> checks knowing that nothing is immediately obvious to replace those
> in 
> Stein, but could be done later when the opportunity arises. If it's 
> debatable on a per-project basis, then I'd defer to the core team
> for 
> the project.
> 

+1 on what Ben, Matt, and Sean said there.