[openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [all] Naming the T release of OpenStack
Remo Mattei
remo at rm.ht
Thu Oct 18 17:08:12 UTC 2018
Michal, that will never work it’s 11 characters long
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 09:43, Eric Fried <openstack at fried.cc> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I'm opposed to this idea.
>
> I admit I don't understand the political framework, nor have I read the
> governing documents beyond [1], but that document makes it clear that
> this is supposed to be a community-wide vote. Is it really legal for
> the TC (or whoever has merge rights on [2]) to merge a patch that gives
> that same body the power to take the decision out of the hands of the
> community? So it's really an oligarchy that gives its constituency the
> illusion of democracy until something comes up that it feels like not
> having a vote on? The fact that it's something relatively "unimportant"
> (this time) is not a comfort.
>
> Not that I think the TC would necessarily move forward with [2] in the
> face of substantial opposition from non-TC "cores" or whatever.
>
> I will vote enthusiastically for "Train". But a vote it should be.
>
> -efried
>
> [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/release-naming.html <https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/release-naming.html>
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611511/ <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611511/>
>
> On 10/18/2018 10:52 AM, Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:
>> +1 for the poll.
>>
>> Let’s follow well established process.
>>
>> If we want to add Train as one of the options for the name I am OK with it.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Jonathan Mills <jonmills at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2018 10:49 AM
>> *To:* openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-sigs] [all] Naming the T release of OpenStack
>>
>>
>>
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>> Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for
>> sensitive information.
>>
>> +1 for just having a poll
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:39 AM David Medberry <openstack at medberry.net
>> <mailto:openstack at medberry.net <mailto:openstack at medberry.net>>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm fine with Train but I'm also fine with just adding it to the
>> list and voting on it. It will win.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, for those not familiar with the debian/ubuntu command "sl",
>> now is the time to become so.
>>
>>
>>
>> apt install sl
>>
>> sl -Flea #ftw
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:35 AM Tony Breeds
>> <tony at bakeyournoodle.com <mailto:tony at bakeyournoodle.com> <mailto:tony at bakeyournoodle.com <mailto:tony at bakeyournoodle.com>>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>> As per [1] the nomination period for names for the T release
>> have
>> now closed (actually 3 days ago sorry). The nominated names and any
>> qualifying remarks can be seen at2].
>>
>> Proposed Names
>> * Tarryall
>> * Teakettle
>> * Teller
>> * Telluride
>> * Thomas
>> * Thornton
>> * Tiger
>> * Tincup
>> * Timnath
>> * Timber
>> * Tiny Town
>> * Torreys
>> * Trail
>> * Trinidad
>> * Treasure
>> * Troublesome
>> * Trussville
>> * Turret
>> * Tyrone
>>
>> Proposed Names that do not meet the criteria
>> * Train
>>
>> However I'd like to suggest we skip the CIVS poll and select
>> 'Train' as
>> the release name by TC resolution[3]. My think for this is
>>
>> * It's fun and celebrates a humorous moment in our community
>> * As a developer I've heard the T release called Train for quite
>> sometime, and was used often at the PTG[4].
>> * As the *next* PTG is also in Colorado we can still choose a
>> geographic based name for U[5]
>> * If train causes a problem for trademark reasons then we can
>> always
>> run the poll
>>
>> I'll leave[3] for marked -W for a week for discussion to happen
>> before the
>> TC can consider / vote on it.
>>
>> Yours Tony.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134995.html
>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/T_Proposals
>> [3]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I0d8d3f24af0ee8578712878a3d6617aad1e55e53
>> [4] https://twitter.com/vkmc/status/1040321043959754752
>> [5]
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T–Z <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T%E2%80%93Z>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T%E2%80%93Z <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T%E2%80%93Z>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openstack-sigs mailing list
>> openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>> <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openstack-sigs mailing list
>> openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>> <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openstack-sigs mailing list
>> openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-sigs mailing list
> openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20181018/eb3aca3d/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list