Open Stack

On 5/23/2018 11:00 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I have yet to see anyone suggest it should be prioritized over other
> work. I expect the extracted and proposed changes/specs
> corresponding to the divergence would be viewed on their own merits
> just like any other change and ignored, reviewed, rejected, et
> cetera as appropriate.

Rather than literally making this a priority, I expect most of the 
feeling is that because of the politics and pressure of competition with 
a fork in another foundation is driving the defensiveness about feeling 
pressured to prioritize review on whatever specs/patches are proposed as 
a result of the code dump.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt