Open Stack

On 02/05/18 20:11, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-05-02 11:38:55 -0400:
>> On 01/05/18 16:21, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-05-01 21:51:19 +0200:
>>>> On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>>> The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to
>>>>> document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier
>>>>> for deployers and users to understand which parts they need to have
>>>>> the features they want [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> John Garbutt has started writing the first such document [2], but
>>>>> as we talked about the content we agreed the TC governance repository
>>>>> is not the best home for it, so I have proposed creating a new
>>>>> repository [3].
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to set up the publishing jobs for that repo so the content
>>>>> goes to docs.openstack.org, we need to settle the ownership of the
>>>>> repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it makes sense for the documentation team to "own" it, but
>>>>> I also think it makes sense for it to have its own review team
>>>>> because it's a bit different from the rest of the docs and we may
>>>>> be able to recruit folks to help who might not want to commit to
>>>>> being core reviewers for all of the documentation repositories. The
>>>>> TC members would also like to be reviewers, to get things going.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, is the documentation team willing to add the new "constellations"
>>>>> repository under their umbrella? Or should we keep it as a TC-owned
>>>>> repository for now?
>>>>
>>>> I'm fine having it as parts of the docs team. The docs PTL should be
>>>> part of the review team for sure,
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> Yeah, I wasn't really clear there: I intend to set up the documentation
>>> and TC teams as members of the new team, so that all members of both
>>> groups can be reviewers of the new repository.
>>
>> +1. What would be the reviewer criteria? Majority vote for adding new 
>> constellations and 2x +2 for changes maybe? Or just 2x +2 for 
>> everything? Just to clarify, since the TC reviews usually operate pretty 
>> differently to other code reviews.
>>
>> thanks,
>> ZB
>>
> 
> This is just documentation, so 2x +2 is what I had in mind.
> 
> Doug
> 

Is it just docs though? I thought the the point of constellations
was for a curated set of projects per use case?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180502/2ab53916/attachment.sig>