[openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

Amy Marrich amy at demarco.com
Fri Mar 30 16:24:44 UTC 2018


And just an aside, the All-in-ones are great tools for new operators to be
able to get in and learn how to use OpenStack, even if the underlying
configuration isn't a multi-node installation.

Amy (spotz)

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 at 08:45 Paul Grist <pgrist at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greeting folks,
>>>
>>> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an
>>> All-In-One installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single
>>> node OpenStack very similar with what we have today with the containerized
>>> undercloud and what we also have with other tools like Packstack or
>>> Devstack.
>>>
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-rocky-all-in-one
>>>
>>> One of the problems that we're trying to solve here is to give a simple
>>> tool for developers so they can both easily and quickly deploy an OpenStack
>>> for their needs.
>>>
>>> Big +1 on the concept,  thanks to all those putting effort into this.
>>
>>
>>> "As a developer, I need to deploy OpenStack in a VM on my laptop,
>>> quickly and without complexity, reproducing the same exact same tooling as
>>> TripleO is using."
>>> "As a Neutron developer, I need to develop a feature in Neutron and test
>>> it with TripleO in my local env."
>>> "As a TripleO dev, I need to implement a new service and test its
>>> deployment in my local env."
>>> "As a developer, I need to reproduce a bug in TripleO CI that blocks the
>>> production chain, quickly and simply."
>>>
>>>
>> Would this also be an opportunity for CI to enable lighter weight sanity
>> and preliminary tests?
>> "As a project, I want to implement a TripleO CI gate to detect
>> regressions early, but have resource and test execution time constraints"
>>
>>
> Paul,
> You are 100% correct sir.  That is the opportunity and intention we have
> here.  Moving forward I see a single node installer that is comprable to
> devstack/packstack as a requirement for the project as we continue to
> improve the deployment to enable other projects to test/ci with TripleO in
> their check jobs.
>
> Thanks for responding and your support!
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Probably more use cases, but to me that's what came into my mind now.
>>>
>>> Dan kicked-off a doc patch a month ago: https://review.openstack.org/#
>>> /c/547038/
>>> And I just went ahead and proposed a blueprint:
>>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/all-in-one
>>> So hopefully we can start prototyping something during Rocky.
>>>
>>> Before talking about the actual implementation, I would like to gather
>>> feedback from people interested by the use-cases. If you recognize yourself
>>> in these use-cases and you're not using TripleO today to test your things
>>> because it's too complex to deploy, we want to hear from you.
>>> I want to see feedback (positive or negative) about this idea. We need
>>> to gather ideas, use cases, needs, before we go design a prototype in Rocky.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone who'll be involved,
>>> --
>>> Emilien Macchi
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> ______________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
>>> unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
>> unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180330/af7be725/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list