[openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap
Wesley Hayutin
whayutin at redhat.com
Fri Mar 30 15:53:37 UTC 2018
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 at 08:45 Paul Grist <pgrist at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greeting folks,
>>
>> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an
>> All-In-One installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single
>> node OpenStack very similar with what we have today with the containerized
>> undercloud and what we also have with other tools like Packstack or
>> Devstack.
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-rocky-all-in-one
>>
>> One of the problems that we're trying to solve here is to give a simple
>> tool for developers so they can both easily and quickly deploy an OpenStack
>> for their needs.
>>
>> Big +1 on the concept, thanks to all those putting effort into this.
>
>
>> "As a developer, I need to deploy OpenStack in a VM on my laptop, quickly
>> and without complexity, reproducing the same exact same tooling as TripleO
>> is using."
>> "As a Neutron developer, I need to develop a feature in Neutron and test
>> it with TripleO in my local env."
>> "As a TripleO dev, I need to implement a new service and test its
>> deployment in my local env."
>> "As a developer, I need to reproduce a bug in TripleO CI that blocks the
>> production chain, quickly and simply."
>>
>>
> Would this also be an opportunity for CI to enable lighter weight sanity
> and preliminary tests?
> "As a project, I want to implement a TripleO CI gate to detect regressions
> early, but have resource and test execution time constraints"
>
>
Paul,
You are 100% correct sir. That is the opportunity and intention we have
here. Moving forward I see a single node installer that is comprable to
devstack/packstack as a requirement for the project as we continue to
improve the deployment to enable other projects to test/ci with TripleO in
their check jobs.
Thanks for responding and your support!
>
>
>> Probably more use cases, but to me that's what came into my mind now.
>>
>> Dan kicked-off a doc patch a month ago:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/547038/
>> And I just went ahead and proposed a blueprint:
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/all-in-one
>> So hopefully we can start prototyping something during Rocky.
>>
>> Before talking about the actual implementation, I would like to gather
>> feedback from people interested by the use-cases. If you recognize yourself
>> in these use-cases and you're not using TripleO today to test your things
>> because it's too complex to deploy, we want to hear from you.
>> I want to see feedback (positive or negative) about this idea. We need to
>> gather ideas, use cases, needs, before we go design a prototype in Rocky.
>>
>> Thanks everyone who'll be involved,
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180330/8a2d65fc/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list