On 2018-06-04 11:30:17 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] > Jeremy has revived the thread about adding a secret/key store to > our base services via the mailing list. We discussed the topic > extensively in the most recent TC office hour, as well. I think we > are close to agreeing that although saying a "castellan supported" > database is insufficient for all desirable use cases, it is sufficient > for a useful number of use cases and would be a reasonable first > step. Jeremy, please correct me if I have misremembered that outcome. > > * http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-May/130567.html > * http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2018/tc.2018-05-31-15.00.html [...] Basically correct (I think we said "a Castellan-compatible key store"). I intend to have a change up for review to append this to the base services list in the next day or so as the mailing list discussion didn't highlight any new concerns and indicated that the previous blockers we identified have been resolved in the intervening year. -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180604/be0e77d1/attachment.sig>