[openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for os-vif 1.11.1
melanie witt
melwittt at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 20:07:47 UTC 2018
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:01:18 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 18-07-26 10:43:05, melanie witt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to ask for an exception to add os-vif 1.11.1 to stable/rocky. The
>> current release for rocky, 1.11.0, added a new feature: the NoOp Plugin, but
>> it's not actually usable (it's not being loaded) because we missed adding a
>> file to the setup.cfg.
>>
>> We have fixed the problem in a one liner add to setup.cfg [1] and we would
>> like to be able to do another release 1.11.1 for rocky to include this fix.
>> That way, the NoOp Plugin feature advertised in the release notes [2] for
>> rocky would be usable for consumers.
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/585530
>> [2] https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/os-vif/unreleased.html#relnotes-1-11-0
>>
>
> Yep, we talked about it in the release channel.
>
> +----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
> | Repository | Filename | Line | Text |
> +----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
> | kuryr-kubernetes | requirements.txt | 18 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
> | nova | requirements.txt | 59 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
> | nova-lxd | requirements.txt | 7 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.9.0 # Apache-2.0 |
> | networking-bigswitch | requirements.txt | 6 | os-vif>=1.1.0 # Apache-2.0 |
> | networking-bigswitch | test-requirements.txt | 25 | os-vif>=1.1.0 # Apache-2.0 |
> | networking-midonet | test-requirements.txt | 40 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
> +----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
>
> All these projects would need re-releases if you plan on raising the
> minimum. They would also need reviews submitted individually for that.
> A upper-constraint only fix would not need that, but would also still
> allow consumers to encounter the bug, up to you to decide.
> LGTM otherwise.
We don't need to raise the minimum -- this will just be a small update
to fix the existing 1.11.0 release. Thanks!
-melanie
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list