[openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for os-vif 1.11.1
Matthew Thode
prometheanfire at gentoo.org
Thu Jul 26 18:01:18 UTC 2018
On 18-07-26 10:43:05, melanie witt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to ask for an exception to add os-vif 1.11.1 to stable/rocky. The
> current release for rocky, 1.11.0, added a new feature: the NoOp Plugin, but
> it's not actually usable (it's not being loaded) because we missed adding a
> file to the setup.cfg.
>
> We have fixed the problem in a one liner add to setup.cfg [1] and we would
> like to be able to do another release 1.11.1 for rocky to include this fix.
> That way, the NoOp Plugin feature advertised in the release notes [2] for
> rocky would be usable for consumers.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/585530
> [2] https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/os-vif/unreleased.html#relnotes-1-11-0
>
Yep, we talked about it in the release channel.
+----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
| Repository | Filename | Line | Text |
+----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
| kuryr-kubernetes | requirements.txt | 18 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| nova | requirements.txt | 59 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| nova-lxd | requirements.txt | 7 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.9.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| networking-bigswitch | requirements.txt | 6 | os-vif>=1.1.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| networking-bigswitch | test-requirements.txt | 25 | os-vif>=1.1.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| networking-midonet | test-requirements.txt | 40 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
+----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
All these projects would need re-releases if you plan on raising the
minimum. They would also need reviews submitted individually for that.
A upper-constraint only fix would not need that, but would also still
allow consumers to encounter the bug, up to you to decide.
LGTM otherwise.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180726/97cb0f18/attachment.sig>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list