[openstack-dev] [keystone] [keystoneauth] Debug data isn't sanitized - bug 1638978
Bhor, Dinesh
Dinesh.Bhor at nttdata.com
Wed Sep 27 11:38:08 UTC 2017
Hi Team,
There are four solutions to fix the below bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystoneauth/+bug/1638978
1) Carry a copy of mask_password() method to keystoneauth from oslo_utils [1]:
Pros:
A. keystoneauth will use already tested and used version of mask_password.
Cons:
A. keystoneauth will have to keep the version of mask_password() method sync with oslo_utils version.
If there are any new "_SANITIZE_KEYS" added to oslo_utils mask_password then those should be added in keystoneauth mask_password also.
B. Copying the "mask_password" will also require to copy its supporting code [2] which is huge.
2) Use Oslo.utils mask_password() method in keystoneauth:
Pros:
A) No synching issue as described in solution #1. keystoneauth will directly use mask_password() method from Oslo.utils.
Cons:
A) You will need oslo.utils library to use keystoneauth.
Objection by community:
- keystoneauth community don't want any dependency on any of OpenStack common oslo libraries.
Please refer to the comment from Morgan: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystoneauth/+bug/1700751/comments/3
3) Add a custom logging filter in oslo logger
Please refer to POC sample here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/617093/
OpenStack core services using any OpenStack individual python-*client (for e.g python-cinderclient used in nova service) will need to pass oslo_logger object during it's
initialization which will do the work of masking sensitive information.
Note: In nova, oslo.logger object is not passed during cinder client initialization (https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/volume/cinder.py#L135-L141),
In this case, sensitive information will not be masked as it isn't using Oslo.logger.
Pros:
A) No changes required in oslo.logger or any OpenStack services if mask_password method is modified in oslo.utils.
Cons:
A) Every log message will be scanned for certain password fields degrading the performance.
B) If consumer of keystoneauth doesn't use oslo_logger, then the sensitive information will not be masked.
C) Will need to make changes wherever applicable to the OpenStack core services to pass oslo.logger object during python-novaclient initialization.
4) Add mask_password formatter parameter in oslo_log:
Add "mask_password" formatter to sanitize sensitive data and pass it as a keyword argument to the log statement.
If the mask_password is set, then only the sensitive information will be masked at the time of logging.
The log statement will look like below:
logger.debug("'adminPass': 'Now you see me'"), mask_password=True)
Please refer to the POC code here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/618019/
Pros:
A) No changes required in oslo.logger or any OpenStack services if mask_password method is modified in oslo.utils.
Cons:
A) If consumer of keystoneauth doesn't use oslo_logger, then the sensitive information will not be masked.
B) If you forget to pass mask_password=True for logging messages where sensitive information is present, then those fields won't be masked with ***.
But this can be clearly documented as suggested by Morgan and Lance.
C) This solution requires you to add a below check in keystoneauth to avoid from an exception being raised in case logger is pure python Logger as it
doesn't accept mask_password keyword argument.
if isinstance(logger, logging.Logger):
logger.debug(' '.join(string_parts))
else:
logger.debug(' '.join(string_parts), mask_password=True)
This check assumes that the logger instance will be oslo_log only if it is not of python default logging.Logger.
Keystoneauth community is not ready to have any dependency on any oslo-* lib, so it seems this solution has low acceptance chances.
Please let me know your opinions about the above four approaches. Which one should we adopt?
[1] https://github.com/openstack/oslo.utils/blob/master/oslo_utils/strutils.py#L248-L313
[2] https://github.com/openstack/oslo.utils/blob/6e04f882c4308ff64fa199d1b127ad225e0a30c4/oslo_utils/strutils.py#L56-L96
Thanks and Regards,
Dinesh Bhor | App. Software Dev. Cnslt.
dinesh.bhor at nttdata.com<mailto:dinesh.bhor at nttdata.com> | VOIP. 8833.8395I | nttdata.com/americas<http://nttdata.com/americas>
NTT DATA, Inc.
Consulting | Digital | Managed Services | Industry Solutions
Learn more:
[Description: Description: cid:image005.jpg at 01D193F0.F70B44C0]<http://americas.nttdata.com/>
[Description: Description: cid:image009.jpg at 01D193F0.F70B44C0]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/ntt-data-americas>
[Description: Description: cid:image010.jpg at 01D193F0.F70B44C0]<https://twitter.com/NTTDATAAmericas>
[Description: Description: cid:image011.jpg at 01D193F0.F70B44C0]<https://www.facebook.com/NTTDATAAmericas>
______________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence
for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged,
confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient,
please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete
and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying
or forwarding.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170927/657c84d5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 940 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170927/657c84d5/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170927/657c84d5/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170927/657c84d5/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 779 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170927/657c84d5/attachment-0003.jpg>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list