Open Stack

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 09:48:06PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-10-25 12:18:59 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote:
> [...]
> > Can we maybe calculate the electorate size using the old method as well so
> > that we can quantify how much of the dropoff (in theory it could be more
> > than 100%) was due to the change in effective eligibility criteria vs.
> > organic change in the number of contributors?
> [...]
> 
> I did a baseline comparison of the old and new methods as they were
> developed, and as of a few days before the most recent PTL elections
> the percentage of "old" TC electorate who lacked discoverable
> foundation member profiles (either because of no matching E-mail
> addresses or lapsed membership due to a failure to vote in board
> elections) was right at 10%. It's likely to have diverged a little since
> that time (my guess is that it won't have moved much), but the
> election officials _should_ be able to produce this number trivially
> since the structured data output by the validation script includes
> all contributors and merely flags the "member" contributors eligible
> to vote by including their discovered OpenStack Foundation
> Individual Member Id numbers.

Yup :)  for the record I replied to Zane before reading you email ...
glad they agree :)

Yours Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171026/4c6c4e54/attachment.sig>